Wednesday, 19 September 2012

AOB 1: (Music Press) changing genre & history



The History of Magazine

The concept of the magazine was first conceived in 1731 with the creation of the Gentleman’s Magazine. Due to the time period, the publication was mainly text based and any illustrations used were drawn in instead of printed.
In 1885, a Good Housekeeping magazine was published. The magazine was aimed at women, and contained details on ‘how to get a man’ and ‘how to keep your husband happy’. Surprisingly, the publication was popular, and without much competition, sold loads of copies.
The next major publication was Vogue, first published in 1897, which featured articles on royalty, and the position of women in society.
1955 saw the publication of Marylyn magazine, which was more celebrity-based, rather than just featuring practical articles.
As the roles of women began to change in the 1960s, and women had more freedom, the magazine industry saw the publication of Nova magazine, which presented a more free view of women.
Magazines for men were typically niche, based on and featuring things like fishing, football and cars.
1986 saw Arena published, the first general lifestyle magazine aimed at men. The publication originally had men on the cover, but switched to women after discovering they were more popular amongst men. The 1980s also brought the modern representation of women. White, young, slim, with perfect teeth and skin. The idea focussed on what the ideal image of women was, rather than a realistic view.
The first black model wasn’t idealised until Vogue published it in 1996, apart from health and fitness magazines.
 
NME

1952 saw the first issue of NME, a non-glossy, tabloid format magazine owned by IPC. Journalists wrote about pop, and would respect the bands and artists.
Morris Kinn was the first editor, and the magazine was the first to feature a music singles chart.
NME itself drew large amounts of inspiration from Rolling Stones magazine, an American publication that used the same layout and free style of writing as NME prior to the U.K magazine’s first publication.
In 1976, two of NME’s most iconic journalists, Julie Burchill and Tony Parsons, signed up with NME after replying to an ad asking for “hip, young gunslingers.”
Their columns about punk rock helped catapult NME ahead of rival magazines Melody Maker and Sound.
The NME changed it’s style to suit readers of a different kind, those into Punk.
The magazine moved away from “just music” and also focussed on politics, philosophy and other “serious” issues.
NME started to focus more on the bands, their lifestyles, and the meanings behind their lyrics rather than just the music itself.
Towards the end of the 1970’s and during the early 80’s, NME’s readers began to abandon the magazine, mostly because the magazine didn’t write about “normal” bands, and was too obsessed with itself and it’s own politics.
As music developed into the 80’s, style in music, especially pop music, started becoming more important than the actual music.
During Thatcher’s reign, NME vocally supported Red Wedge, and the labour movement.
During the early 90’s, NME suffered a phase known as the “Hip Hop Wars”, the concept of black artists rapping didn’t appeal, and NME lost two thirds of its audience.
Most of the old music tabloid magazines faded away towards the end of the 80’s and the early 90’s, apart from NME, whose switch to modern magazine format has helped it retain its readership.
Morrisey, a former fanatic of NME magazine, became popular in the early 90’s, and after an interview, became NME’s poster boy, the magazine put him on the cover for almost any excuse, until journalist John Harris put Morrissey on the cover and called him a fascist, Morrissey returned to the paper 12 years after not talking to NME when Conor Mcnochols managed to convince him to come back.
Sales of CD’s began to fall once things like MP3 players, Ipods and Youtube came about, meaning the Music Press has lost a lot of both advertising revenue and sales, and NME has been forced to expand into other areas of music, such as reviewing the new technology.

AOB 1: History of Music Video



A music video is more of a tool than anything else, used by record labels and production companies use to convey a certain message or promote a band/artist.
Music videos have become an incredibly popular method for stars to gain popularity, and with the evolution of digital imaging and CGI, the music video industry is constantly gaining momentum.

Music videos differ from other genres in that they always convey a certain conventions or portray certain characteristics.
The concept of music video as we know it today was first utilised by the Beatles in the 1960s, when they filmed a video for their single strawberry fields. Instead of simply filming a video of the band playing, the music video simply contained footage of the band’s members running around in a field.
The music video genre has expanded and grown since it’s introduction, with different genres using different styles and themes, and particular artists introducing new ideas and concepts, such as David Bowie in the 1980s, with the music video “Ashes to Ashes”, in which Bowie experimented with surreal concepts and themes.

Genre characteristics can be distinguished more clearly in recent music videos, with stage performance being utilised amongst rock bands and the subsequent sub-genres, dance routines amongst pop and boy and girl bands, and surrealist concepts in other genres.
Other factors affect specific genres, such as with pop and soft rock, where how the star looks is as important as their music, with singers and band members wearing bright, trend-setting clothing, whereas with rock and metal bands, appearance takes on a darker, more free form, with denim, dark colours and darker concepts expressed in music videos, such as Linkin Park, a band famous for adapting and re-inventing the Rap Metal genre and who rated as the sixth greatest band in the music video industry in 2003.

Other bizarre concepts were utilised in the music video industry.
Bands like The Gorillaz owe their roots to the Dire Straits, with their music video “Money for Nothing” in 1986, which was the first music video to use animation, and ran on what would today be considered a basic graphics engine.
Though the music video industry is tailored to all tastes and genres, mainstream songs, especially by female artists, will have one or more sexual reference(s).
Whilst some artists stop at this, others will go further, including highly suggestive dance routines, voyeuristic acts and sometimes even sexual activities, whether included in the video itself or hinted in the lyrics.
A good majority of these videos end up banned because of being too lude.
Music videos such as Hurricane by 30 Seconds To Mars were banned because of sexual acts being utilised in the video, in this case, bondage, violence, and the repeated use of a sledgehammer.
Other videos, such as 45 by Shinedown, were banned completely from MTV because the band/artists refused to change the lyrics of their songs to fit the MTV censorship policy.
Shinedown’s lead singer, Brent Smith, expressed his outrage after MTV heavily changed the lyrics of the chorus without the band’s consent to fit their censorship, stating that if they “disagreed with the lyrics and message of the song, they might as well not play it altogether.”
The modern, censored MTV is a far cry from it’s humble beginnings back in the early 1980s, when former Monkee Mike Nesmith came up with the idea for Popclips on Nickelodeon. The idea was expanded and developed and other music channels began broadcasting with the only feature of these channels being the music videos themselves. Advertisers, seeing the profitable world of music video, began to be drawn to such music channels, and MTV came into being in 1981, with a long and fruitful life ahead of it.

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

AOB 2: Magazine features Pie Chart

This Pie Chart was developed to show how much of the NME magazine flatplan was dedicated to different areas of the magazine, using different areas in different categories. the categories used are News, Gigs, Interviews, Features, Adverts, Reviews and Unpaid adverts.

AOB 2: Goodwyn Analysis X3




AOB 2 (music press) structure



AOB 2 essay

Looking at the flat plan for the magazine's structure, the said magazine at first appears to be a chaotic mismatch of adverts and articles with no coherent structure.
The magazine is dictated by an editorial on the first page, which tells the reader about the regular features or interesting articles, and also contains a table of contents to direct the reader to their desired article/feature.
On the opposite page, the back of the front cover, are several adverts, including an ad for HMV and one for Razorlight. The adverts are in keeping with NME's music-oriented target audience, and as such are much more appealing than an ad for Red Bull.
At the bottom of the editorial page is an ad for NME magazine. This kind of self-publication is popular in a lot of magazines, because it often reveals snippets of upcoming features, keeping current readers hooked and encouraging new readers to keep with the magazine.
After the contents page are several pages of news, revolving around the magazine's musical theme, including stories about artists, bands and upcoming tours.
The news section goes on for six pages, with a break after page four to allow for a page of adverts.
Inter-spacing ads with features in the magazine is a ploy used by NME to attract audiences to the products being advertised. By vaguely relating the ad to the feature it is with, the magazine is establishing a link between the two that the audience will take note of.
This ploy is most commonly used in NME with reviews and albums.
Having an advert of the album next to the review helps to establish it as something the reader wants to buy.

Following this are two pages of letters sent in by readers of NME, mostly discussing trivial matters to do with bands and the music in general.
In a strip down the side of this page is another ad for the magazine, which NME use for the same effect, but this time going into more detail, using text to advertise next week's issue in the form of a miniature article, this is called an Advertorial.
More adverts follow this, along with features regarding upcoming bands. If the magazine follows the band's progress, then this may be used to attract audience interest, enticing the reader to keep reading.
The middle of the magazine is mostly filled with regular features and articles, which regular readers will be familiar with and will actively look out for. Mainstream bands like My Chemical Romance make common appearances in NME.
The showing of yet another HMV ad suggests at least a minor partnership with the company, a view which the ad shows with the line 'HMV recommends', giving a listing of suggested albums which will appeal to NME's mainstream audience.
More ads follow, interspaced with reviews of concerts, tracks and albums. This is an effective example of the ploy mentioned earlier, where adverts and articles are interlinked.

Towards the rear of the magazine are several pages of adverts for both products and gigs.
Putting the majority of ads towards the rear of the magazine is a ploy commonly used by magazines. The audience doesn't want to see too much bland information without anything to interest them, and thus only dedicated readers ever reach the ads at the rear of the magazine.
Following this is a mix of ads, guides and competitions to keep any of the more fanatical readers occupied.
The back cover consists of an advert for an upcoming album, a last nag at the reader to buy the advertised products.

Sunday, 16 September 2012

AOB 4: Stephen Gately - Guardian vs Daily Mail


The original article, detailing Stephen Gately’s death, was written by Jan Moir of the Daily Mail.
Moir’s article originally seems sympathetic towards Gately’s death, stating that “The news of Stephen Gately’s death was deeply shocking.” And that Gately had died pointlessly.
As the article continues, however, we soon see that what Moir is writing isn’t, in fact, sympathetic, but just another excuse to have a crack at the gay community, and Stephen’s family, at the expense of the former Boyzone member’s death.
The article, regrettably, was well-written and was made to seem like it made a good point when in fact it didn’t.
Almost on a parallel to Moir’s sympathetic opening, the article carries on to explain Gately’s death, post-mortem and all, rather vaguely.
Though Moir honeys her words, the article is in fact incredibly homophobic in a roundabout way.
She tailors the article to explain Stephen’s death, but does it in a way that suggests something else was to blame other than what actually happened, almost making fluid in the lungs look like murder.

That the public reacted strongly comes as no surprise.
Moir wasn’t careful enough in her wording to avoid people seeing through the honeyed words to the deeply brutal homophobic meaning within.
A large internet campaign on Twitter, led by Stephen Fry and Derren Brown, criticised the article and Moir for writing it.
The fact that Moir had the gall to write it immediately after Stephen’s death, and also accuse Gately’s family of using natural happenstance as a cover-up for something more sinister, shows that Moir has a serious lack of compassion, or even human emotion, towards Gately, and maybe even the gay community in general.
The fact that Moir saw the post-mortem, knew that Gately had died under natural circumstances and yet continued to write the article suggests an infinitely arrogant persona.

Unsurprisingly, the reactions from both the Daily Mail’s audience and the audience of the write-up in the Guardian were very much the same.
Moir’s article received a lot of hateful comments on the first day, posted directly online and on exactly the same page as her article.
People were shocked and appalled at the level of homophobia Moir displayed, and the Daily Mail lost a number of readers because of Moir’s article.
Both the write-up in the Guardian and Charlie Brooker’s article got positive comments regarding their harsh treatment of Moir’s article.
Brooker and the Guardian were entirely fair in their treatment of Moir, after the accusations she made in her article, effectively stating she knew better than forensics and post-mortem evaluations.
Brooker and the Guardian helped bring to light exactly how cruel Moir’s article was, giving rise to a public voice that has spread throughout the media, with several advertising companies withdrawing from the Mail completely, and yet more demanding that their advertisements be moved so as not to be slandered by Moir’s article.

AOB 4: Representation in Music Videos


 The four videos analysed for this essay were all Beyonce music videos, this was done to make comparison easier and to help get across the different roles an artist can play in a music video. The four videos used were Crazy in Love, Single Ladies, Halo and Telephone.
These four videos demonstrate how versatile an artist can be in a music video, and also how an artist’s style changes the further they get into their career.
Each music video carries a different message, not necessarily matching with the lyrics.
In Crazy in Love, Beyonce is represented promiscuous and revealing.
The nature of the music video presents it as upbeat, with a lot of revealing clothing and indicative imagery. Seductive dance moves create a certain image of Beyonce.
Beyonce claimed that her alter-ego, Sasha Fierce, was “born” in the music video, which used a lot of camera cuts and scene changes to keep with the upbeat and high energy nature of the video.
In Single Ladies, Beyonce uses a simpler, more minimalistic approach, with only a white backdrop, retaining a seductive effect.
The music video is technically one unbroken dance routine, using suggestive and lustful dance moves.
Halo casts Beyonce in a less saucy light, wearing more normal clothes in the video and using an everyday setting. The video is described as being pure and clean, and Beyonce as innocent and pure, the opposite of Sasha Fierce.
In Telephone, Beyonce isn’t the main focus of the video, but in it is portrayed as naughty and energetic, wearing abnormal and abstract clothing, which is somewhat conceptual.
The videos are influential, persuading the audience to aspire to be like Beyonce, as well as broad advertising, such as in Telephone, where branded products are seen during the music video and narratives.
The videos draw female audiences in with the idea of aspiring to be like Beyonce, whilst the male audience will be drawn in more because of her attractiveness and the form of dancing.

Saturday, 15 September 2012

AOB 5: Linkin Park onesheet


AOB 5: Record Labels

AOB 5 Distribution & Ownership (Music Press)

Task 1
Who owns and distributes the NME?
The NME is currently owned by IPC, who brought the print from Maurice Kinn in 1963, and slowly changed the paper from its original tabloid layout to the magazine print that people buy today.

Who owns IPC?
IPC is a wholly owned subsidary of Time Inc., which was formed in the 1950s.
IPC Ltd was the subject of a management buyout in 1998, and the company was renamed IPC Media. The company that brought IPC, Civen, then sold the company to Time Inc., a magazine publishing subsidary of Time Warner in 2001.

Who owns Time Inc.?
Time Inc. is a subsidary to the media conglomerate Time Warner.
Formed in 1990, the group was a merge of the original Time Inc. and Warner Communications.
The company published 130 magazines, and grew to own several british magazines and companies, such as IPC.

Time Warner is a multi-national media corporation headquartered in Time Warner Center in New York, America.
It was the world's second largest media and entertainment conglomerate as of 2010, second only to Disney, as well as the world's largest media conglomerate.

AOB 5: Distribution & Ownership

AOL
  • In 1991, America Online became one of America's major Internet Service Providers (ISP's), combining internet experience with a clear business plan and aggressive marketing.
  • AOL's success was momentous, to the point that the service almost crashed from being swamped with customers.
  • In the early 1990s. AOL was the target of several big information technology companies, including Microsoft, but AOL's chief executive refused to become subsidiary to a larger company, and AOL expanded into Europe and the U.K.
  • The company became powerful enough to buy out rival ISP Compuserve in 1995, and later the browser Netscape.
  • Software development companies became targets as AOL looked to create an Instant Messaging Server.
  • Companies like Dell computers and General Motors have placed AOL in an unchallenged position within the industry, and the company now provide service to roughly 35 million subscribers, 10 million of which are in Europe and the U.K
  • AOL's merge with Time Warner in 2000 was seen by many as the ideal mix of technology and contents.

Time Warner
  • Warner Brothers was originally one of the big five major film companies which dominated Hollywood in the 1930s.
  • As the film industry began to collapse during the 1940s, Warner expanded into music and television, leading to a corporation called Warner Communications.
  • The company took off, growing to own a considerable fiber-optic cable network throughout the U.S.A, and launching new channels such as HBO.
  • Warner communications merged with several companies in the 80s and 90s, including Time Incorporated and Turner Broadcasting.
  • Warner's synchronized sound system, introduced in 1927's The Jazz Singer, led Hollywood films into the sound era, and in 1975, Warner was the pioneer of satellite broadcasting in the USA, introducing several new satellite channels.
  • Despite massive investments in the technology and its promotion, Time Warner were unable to build up sufficient usage for its internet service to be made worthwhile.
  • By merging with AOL, Time Warner were finally able to get their products sold and consumed by the next generation of media audiences.

Friday, 14 September 2012

AOB6: Music Video Regulation


Rihanna/ Ofcom essay
I agree partially with the decisions Ofcom made regarding the music video S&M, by Rihanna.
Ofcom banned the video because of sexual imagery and controversial content.
Imagery in the music video included shots of Rihanna in a bondage suit, whipping men dressed as press journalists, walking a man (Parez Hilton) on a leash, inducing sexual positions with blowup dolls, and lying on the floor with her hands and feet tied up dressed up in a latex suit.
Several other concepts of the same genre were included in the video, which Ofcom banned after receiving a complaint that the music video was completely unsuitable for daytime viewing.
Ofcom addressed rule 1.3 of the code, which regards suitability of content in such music videos for children under a certain age.
Whilst Ofcom’s reasons for banning the video are justifiable, other factors should be considered.
Channels that show such content are usually adult-only channels, and factors to be considered also include viewer discretion, meaning that an adult viewing such content ought to do so without permitting a child to watch, and parental supervision, meaning that it is the responsibility of the parent to decide if such content is suitable.
Fault could also be laid with Ofcom for banning the music video completely.
Instead, the organization could have insisted the music video be shown later on, at more suitable times.

AOB 6: (Music Press) Regulation

PCC is a self regulatory organization which is funded by a levy from the Newspaper Industry. PCC stands for Press Complaints Commission, which is deemed toothless by the public and the media because they don't want to "Bite the hand that feeds", meaning that because the newspapers pay the commission, the PCC has to be careful over what they choose to slander.
If a publication breaches the code set by the PCC, usually the first step towards "Righting the wrong" is adjudication, which often results in the said paper having to give a formal apology in the form of an article or public address.
Most papers take a "publish and be damned" approach, meaning that they publish the information and deal with the consequences as they come.
The most common complaint the PCC faces are complaints about the accuracy of information.
The PCC employs a strict complaints code, which covers a number of areas, including privacy, harassment, discrimination, financial journalism and witness payments.
By stating that the article is in the interests of the public, the editor is making an attempt to wriggle out of the accusations piled on them by the PCC.
Though they carry great weight in the newspapers and media industry, the PCC is not connected in any way to the government, and thus has no legal power with which to permanently shut a paper down.